Friday, September 4, 2009

When is MPLS the Best Choice For Your Network Backbone?

You have an often confusing menu Adsl Ethernet Modem choices Streamyx your voice/data network today. A hot option for Dsl Internet networks streamyx 4m MPLS (Multi-Protocol Label Switching). Is MPLS the right choice for your business?

MPLS provides for use of short tails into a large network. The tail price being a larger proportion or any connectivity cost. Therefore, MPLS works out very well when compared to long distance point to point links or when connectiong multiple sites.

VPLS the new generation of MPLS enables multi-site to multi-site connectivity similar to having a WAN all on the same LAN Internet Speed Check This reduces single points of failure www tmnet provides for greater control and facilities the roll out of new services across a WAN as the end user doesn't require any technical knowledge to deploy mult-level QoS and virtual switching between sites. In layer 2 VPLS the network Adsl Cable Modem completely transparent to the end customer.

MPLS usually is a cheap way of connecting several offices point to point for data transfer, and once you pull that one, expanding it to voice is plain and cheap. It all depends what technology you generally use to connect several points together.

MPLS is the best choice when you are running latency sensitive Speed Up Dsl over your WAN. Also, if your business has multiple locations, MPLS is a cheap broadband connection way to have redundancy built into your WAN.

MPLS brings the advantages of dedicated links in the cost of shared IP networks, with multiservice capabilities and support for traffic engineering as well as QoS. MPLS also provides faster operation on a shared service provider network by using label switching instead of IP routing table lookup at every hop. You can create both point to point or multipoint VPNs using MPLS.

So the answer is, when you want a single converged last mile (Services-voice/data/video/internet) for multiple locations in a cost lower than dedicated links ..... while having the efficiency as good as Or near to dedicated/TDM/ATM links. Then "MPLS is The Choice."

A couple additional comments based upon my carrier experience. MPLS is appropriate for voice/ data because the technology supports trafic prioritization (QoS). An additional consideration is that most carriers have Adsl Cable Modem their engineering and network operations on supporting network MPLS-based VPNs. Consequently, you will be able to negotiate better SLAs from your Service Provider. One should also plan an end-to-end QoS strategy for your applications. Ensure you are aware of the application performance requirements prior to designing your network.

To summarize, the positive attributes of MPLS are the flexibility of access methods and transports supported, the scalability of bandwidth demands, and of course, the QoS and traffic prioritization capabilities.

Please heed a warning about the last mile provider. If you can find one provider to cover all of your locations (including the last mile), then this will cause you a lot less headaches.

Michael is the owner of FreedomFire Communications....including DS3-Bandwidth.com. Michael also authors Broadband Nation where you're always welcome to drop in and catch up on the latest BroadBand news, tips, insights, and ramblings for the masses.

There are two types of people in the world: Those that hate change, and those that embrace it. I tend to fall into the latter category. And that's why OS X Snow Leopard is an odd product for me.On one hand, I like the idea that Apple has decided to stick with something that is working so well (OS X Leopard), and make it lighter, faster and all-around better. On the other, it's fairly hard to tell that you're actually using something that is any different from the previous version. Yes, there are many little, subtle changes all over, but aside from maybe Quicktime X, there is nothing that immediately strikes you as being different. I'd be lying if I said this wasn't a little disappointing to me.
TechCrunch50 Conference 2009: September 14-15, 2009, San Francisco


No comments:

Post a Comment